Judgment Header
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis [2007] SGHC 207
Loading…
[2007] SGHC 207
General Division of the High Court of Singapore4 Dec 2007OS 2386/2006, SUM 121/2007
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“retion cannot be exercised in bad faith, or in a manner contrary to the quality guaranteed under art. 12 of the Constitution” (See Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis [2008] 2 SLR (R) 49, [2007] SGHC 207, para. 148)”. [18] Although made in passing, the observations represent a major shift away from the posi”
“of Attorney General’s immunity with regard to civil actions. His Lordship also referred to the Singapore position stated in the Court of Appeal case of Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guan Neo Phyllis [2007] SGHC 207; [2008] 2 SLR 239. In that case, Chan Sek Keong CJ opined that the Attorney General’s power can be revie”
“ion cannot be exercised in bad faith, or in a manner contrary to the quality guaranteed under Article 12 of the Constitution” (see Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis [2008] 2 SLR(R) 49, [2007] SGHC 207, para. 148). [77] Reverting back to our present appeals, we have carefully considered the judgment of the”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Guat Neo Phyllis [2007] SGHC 207
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 2386/2006, SUM 121/2007
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2007-12-04
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.