Judgment Header
Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199
Loading…
[2008] SGHC 199
General Division of the High Court of Singapore7 Nov 2008Cr M 26/2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“smuggle an appeal under the umbrella of s 397. In this regard, we must bear in mind the caution rendered by Tay Yong Kwang J in the Singapore High Court decision of Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199 (at [14]) that “[i]t only takes a little ingenuity to re-cast what is a straightforward, commonsensical”
“tion of fact is “dressed up” in order to make it look like a question of law. As Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) observed, in the Singapore High Court decision of Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199 at [14]:”
“l application of principles of law to the relevant facts into an apparent legal conundrum which seemingly calls for determination by the highest court of the land” (Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199 at [14]). In the same vein, this court in Portcullis at [6] noted that the question of importance “is to”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199
Case Metadata
Case No: Cr M 26/2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-11-07
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.