[2008] SGHC 199

“smuggle an appeal under the umbrella of s 397. In this regard, we must bear in mind the caution rendered by Tay Yong Kwang J in the Singapore High Court decision of Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199 (at [14]) that “[i]t only takes a little ingenuity to re-cast what is a straightforward, commonsensical”

“tion of fact is “dressed up” in order to make it look like a question of law. As Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) observed, in the Singapore High Court decision of Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199 at [14]:”

“l application of principles of law to the relevant facts into an apparent legal conundrum which seemingly calls for determination by the highest court of the land” (Ong Boon Kheng v Public Prosecutor [2008] SGHC 199 at [14]). In the same vein, this court in Portcullis at [6] noted that the question of importance “is to”