Judgment Header
Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50
Loading…
[2008] SGHC 50
General Division of the High Court of Singapore7 Apr 2008Suit 665/2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 7 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“d Ltd v Federated Employees Insurance Association (1973) 117 SJ 13 per Cairns LJ). Unless the cause of action is admitted by the defendant (see illustration (b) of s 102 and Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50, where the defendant admitted the cause of action and pleaded payment and so must prove that the admitted”
“d Ltd v Federated Employees Insurance Association (1973) 117 SJ 13 per Cairns LJ). Unless the cause of action is admitted by the defendant (see illustration (b) of s 102 and Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50, where the defendant admitted the cause of action and pleaded payment and so must prove that the admitted”
“d Ltd v Federated Employees Insurance Association (1973) 117 SJ 13 per Cairns LJ). Unless the cause of action is admitted by the defendant (see illustration (b) of s 102 and Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50, where the defendant admitted the cause of action and pleaded payment and so must prove that the admitted”
“[61] A plaintiff has the onus to begin the case, even if the defence pleads fraud…Unless the cause of action is admitted by the defendant (see illustration (b) of s 102 and Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50, where the defendant admitted the cause of action and pleaded payment and so must prove that the admitted”
“[61] A plaintiff has the onus to begin the case, even if the defence pleads fraud…Unless the cause of action is admitted by the defendant (see illustration (b) of s 102 and Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50, where the defendant admitted the cause of action and pleaded payment and so must prove that the admitted”
“[61] A plaintiff has the onus to begin the case, even if the defence pleads fraud…Unless the cause of action is admitted by the defendant (see illustration (b) of s 102 and Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50, where the defendant admitted the cause of action and pleaded payment and so must prove that the admitted”
“[61] A plaintiff has the onus to begin the case, even if the defence pleads fraud…Unless the cause of action is admitted by the defendant (see illustration (b) of s 102 and Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50, where the defendant admitted the cause of action and pleaded payment and so must prove that the admitted”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu [2008] SGHC 50
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 665/2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-04-07
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.