Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Kwek Seow Hock [2009] SGHC 202
Court DecisionSGHC
[2009] SGHC 202
[2009] SGHC 202
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Sept 2009CC 8/2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
4Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In Public Prosecutor v Kwek Seow Hock [2009] SGHC 202, the High Court considered several factors in dealing with a defence of own consumption: (a) the rate of drug consumption; (b) the frequency of supply; (c) whether the accused had the financial means”
“(c) Whether the accused had the financial means to purchase the drugs for himself (Muhammad bin Abdullah at [31] citing PP v Kwek Seow Hock [2009] SGHC 202 at [73]).”
“The applicant cites the cases of Muhammad bin Abdullah and Public Prosecutor v Kwek Seow Hock [2009] SGHC 202 (“Kwek Seow Hock”) in support of the Apportionment Argument. There is, however, a critical difference between the present case and those two cases: while a total consumption defence was pursued in th”
“n any of his statements that the whole quantity of drugs was for sale (Muhammad bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2017] 1 SLR 427 at [31], citing Public Prosecutor v Kwek Seow Hock [2009] SGHC 202).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: CC 8/2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2009-09-11
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.