Judgment Header
Attorney-General v Tan Liang Joo John and Others [2009] SGHC 41
Loading…
[2009] SGHC 41
General Division of the High Court of Singapore18 Feb 2009OS 1242/2008, 1244/2008, 1246/2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ida binti Zamani; Messrs CK Ling, Izzaida & Irna For the putative contemnor: Raja Eileen Soraya binti Raja Aman; Messrs Raja, Darryl & Loh Cases referred to: Attorney-General v Tan Liang Joo John [2009] SGHC 41 Bar Council Malaysia v. Tun Dato' Seri Arifin Zakaria & Ors And Another Reference [2018] 10 CLJ 129 Com”
“n’s case (above), it was stated that in approaching the concept of fair criticism, the court should bear in mind the non-exhaustive factors set out in Attorney-General v Tan Liang Joo John And Others [2009] SGHC 41. Some of the factors to be considered in determining whether mala fides has been proved include: a) the e”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Attorney-General v Tan Liang Joo John and Others [2009] SGHC 41
Case Metadata
Case No: OS 1242/2008, 1244/2008, 1246/2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2009-02-18
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.