Judgment Header
George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George [2009] SGHC 79
Loading…
[2009] SGHC 79
General Division of the High Court of Singapore3 Apr 2009DA 12/2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“the Defendant is in agreement that the evidence of the factual witness ought to be preferred where the experts give conflicting testimonies citing the case of George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George [2009] SGHC 79 where it was held that: [65] In the present case, the expert opinions were not unanimous. Dr Ngui did not”
“12. George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George [2009] SGHC 79 **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 46”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
George Abraham Vadakathu v Jacob George [2009] SGHC 79
Case Metadata
Case No: DA 12/2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2009-04-03
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.