[2010] SGHC 20

“t exceed its jurisdiction (this term being used in the sense of mandate, competence or authority).” (emphasis added) In Ting Kang Chung John v. Teo Hee Lai Building Constructions Pte Ltd and others [2010] SGHC 20, the High Court in Singapore held at pp. 637 — 639: “27 This delay of one year and four months resulted in”

“t of the parties. [35] YTL’s counsel further cited some cases from near and far, namely the Singapore High Court case of Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Constructions Pte Ltd and others [2010] SGHC 20, the 22 Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench decisions in Flock v. Flock [2007] A.J. No. 597 and Petro-Canada v.”

“aysia Incorporated [2004] 2 MLJ 49 Thermal Energy Construction Limited v Ae & E Lentjes UK Limited [2009] EWHC 408 (TCC) Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Constructions Pte Ltd and others [2010] SGHC 20 UES Holdings Pte Ltd v Grouteam Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 275 Wrp Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd v Ns Bluescope Lysaght Mal”

“reement of the parties (see Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2015; Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Constructions Pte Ltd and others [2010] SGHC 20; and Ken Grouting Sdn Bhd v RKT Nusantara Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2021] 4 MLJ 622). Hence, the Award”

“reement of the parties (see Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2015; Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Constructions Pte Ltd and others [2010] SGHC 20; and Ken Grouting Sdn Bhd v RKT Nusantara Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2021] 4 MLJ 622). Hence, the Award”