Judgment Header
ALC v ALF [2010] SGHC 231
Court DecisionSGHC
[2010] SGHC 231
[2010] SGHC 231
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Aug 2010Originating Summons No 747 of 2010/W
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“rossed when the documents sought are clearly irrelevant, as I have found above, or when the subpoena application is an abuse of process or where it has been issued for a collateral purpose: ALC v ALF [2010] SGHC 231 at [19]–[21]. I also find the subpoena to be an abuse of process. In my view, the Supplier is seeking to”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 747 of 2010/W
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-08-11
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.