Judgment Header
ALJ v ALK [2010] SGHC 255
Loading…
[2010] SGHC 255
General Division of the High Court of Singapore26 Aug 2010Divorce Transfer No 3435 of 2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“44. In this regard, the Wife cited a Singapore case of UFU (M.W) v UFV [2017] SGHCF 23 which cited the case of ALJ v ALK [2010] SGHC 255 and AQT v AQT [2011] SGHC 138 as follows:”
“The courts have generally accepted that legal fees are not to be deducted from the matrimonial pool. In ALJ v ALK [2010] SGHC 255, Woo Bih Li J considered that “[i]f [a party] had incurred legal fees on the divorce and ancillary proceedings, he should have used his own assets to pay for them first and not matrimonial a”
“I acknowledge the principle that preserving the status quo for stability is in the welfare of the child (ALJ v ALK [2010] SGHC 255). It is true that the status quo has essentially arisen from the interim C&C order (as opposed to having arisen organically). Nonetheless, I do not think that this precludes the court from”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
ALJ v ALK [2010] SGHC 255
Case Metadata
Case No: Divorce Transfer No 3435 of 2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-08-26
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.