Judgment Header
RBS Coutts Bank Ltd v Brunner Hans-Peter [2010] SGHC 342
[2010] SGHC 342
General Division of the High Court of Singapore19 Nov 2010Suit No 560 of 2010 (Summons No 4012 of 2010)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“d not go on their separate and independent ways (at [46]). [34] The principles laid down in Chan Chin Cheung have been considered in subsequent cases such as RBS Coutts Bank Ltd v Brunner Hans-Peter [2010] SGHC 342 (“RBS Coutts”) and Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2014] 3 SLR 1337 (“Ram”
“The principles laid down in Chan Chin Cheung have been considered in subsequent cases such as RBS Coutts Bank Ltd v Brunner Hans-Peter [2010] SGHC 342 (“RBS Coutts”) and Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet (Singapore) Pte Ltd and others [2014] 3 SLR 1337 (“Ram Mittal”). These cases have expanded on Chan Chin Che”
“In both contexts, our courts have set out various non-exhaustive factors to be considered (see BNP Paribas at [34] citing RBS Coutts Bank Ltd v Brunner Hans-Peter [2010] SGHC 342 and Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2014] 3 SLR 1337 and JE Synergy at [16] citing Tomolugen at [180] and CSY”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
RBS Coutts Bank Ltd v Brunner Hans-Peter [2010] SGHC 342
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 560 of 2010 (Summons No 4012 of 2010)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-11-19
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.