Judgment Header
Littau Robin Duane v Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd [2010] SGHC 361
Court DecisionSGHC
[2010] SGHC 361
[2010] SGHC 361
General Division of the High Court of Singapore10 Dec 2010Suit No 156 of 2010 (Summonses No 3229 of 2010 and 3351 of 2010)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“t of trade, I am of the view that the reasonableness and validity of the non-solicitation clause should not be assessed at the interlocutory stage (Littau Robin Duane v Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd [2010] SGHC 361 at [30]). The relevant threshold at this stage is whether there is “a serious question to be tried”, whi”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 156 of 2010 (Summonses No 3229 of 2010 and 3351 of 2010)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-12-10
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.