Judgment Header
Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Tai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd [2010] SGHC 375
Court DecisionSGHC
[2010] SGHC 375
[2010] SGHC 375
General Division of the High Court of Singapore28 Dec 2010Companies Winding Up No 239 of 2003 (Summons No 4244 of 2010)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 6 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
6Later cases and laws citing this decision
- CitedKHOO CHOOI THUAN v 1. ) Loh Kon Fah [Notis Pemberhentian Di Kandungan 14] (AA-24NCC-19-09/2023)Case
“1987) BCLC 409 (Ch D); Hong Investment Pte Ltd v. Thai Thong **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the originality of this document via eFILING portal 11 Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd [2010] SGHC 375). [15] Courts have gone to the extent of saying there need not be personal misconduct or unfitness. (See Ad”
“-84] LRC (Comm) 676; In re Sir John Moore Gold Mining Company (1879) 12 Ch D 325; Re Keypak Homecare Ltd [1987] BCLC 409 (Ch D); Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Tai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd [2010] SGHC 375)””
“-84] LRC (Comm) 676; In re Sir John Moore Gold Mining Company (1879) 12 Ch D 325; Re Keypak Homecare Ltd [1987] BCLC 409 (Ch D); Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Tai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd [2010] SGHC 375)””
“[1980-1984] LRC (Comm) 676; Re Sir John Moore Gold Mining Co. (1879) 12 Ch D 325; Re Keypak Homecare Ltd. 1987 BCLC 409 (Ch D); Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Thai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd [2010] SGHC 375]. 20 [15] Courts have gone to the extent of saying there need not be personal misconduct or unfitness. [”
“roach also taken on an application under s 268 of the Act, which is the equivalent of s 302 in the compulsory winding up regime: Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Tai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd [2010] SGHC 375 (“Hong Investment”) at [5].”
Show 1 moreShow fewer
“e Companies Act must be equally applicable to s 139(1) of the IRDA. In this regard, Tan Lee Meng J in the High Court decision of Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Tai Thong Hung Plastics Industries (Pte) Ltd [2010] SGHC 375 adopted the principles articulated in Woon and Hicks, The Companies Act of Singapore – An Annotation (Le”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Companies Winding Up No 239 of 2003 (Summons No 4244 of 2010)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-12-28
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.