Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Sufian bin Nordin and others [2010] SGHC 74
Loading…
[2010] SGHC 74
General Division of the High Court of Singapore10 Mar 2010Criminal Case No 9 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The Defence referred to Public Prosecutor v Sufian bin Nordin and others [2010] SGHC 74 (“Sufian”) which involved seven offenders who were charged under s 304(a) read with s 149 of the Penal Code. Six of the offenders were each sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment with ten strokes of the”
“(at [34]) and WAG v WAH [2022] SGFC 17 (at [158]), that a stay application is not an occasion to re-litigate the correctness of the judgment. As noted in Strandore Invest A/S and others v Soh Kim Wat [2010] SGHC 74 (at [10]) (“Strandore”), the special circumstances “must be circumstances which go to the enforcement of”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Sufian bin Nordin and others [2010] SGHC 74
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 9 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-03-10
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.