Judgment Header
Nalini d/o Ramachandran v Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan [2010] SGHC 98
Loading…
[2010] SGHC 98
General Division of the High Court of Singapore29 Mar 2010Divorce Suit No 5253 of 2006
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“, the CPF Board paid a sum directly to HDB to discharge the outstanding mortgage loan on the home (“HPIS Payout”). The court’s decision below in Nalini d/o Ramachandran v Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan [2010] SGHC 98 (“Nalini”) was that the HPIS Payout was not for the husband’s sole benefit and it should not be deducted”
“e, duress, undue influence, unconscionability as well as illegality and public policy) may operate to unravel an otherwise binding agreement. In Nalini d/o Ramachandran v Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan [2010] SGHC 98, Tay Yong Kwang J held (at [14]) that a consent order for division of matrimonial assets should not be as”
“t worth of the matrimonial home. Indeed, the High Court in the same case drew a distinction between the HPIS and an “ordinary” insurance policy (Nalini d/o Ramachandran v Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan [2010] SGHC 98 at [22]):”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Nalini d/o Ramachandran v Saseedaran Nair s/o Krishnan [2010] SGHC 98
Case Metadata
Case No: Divorce Suit No 5253 of 2006
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-03-29
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.