Judgment Header
Chan Miu Yin v Philip Morris Singapore Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 161
Court DecisionSGHC
[2011] SGHC 161
[2011] SGHC 161
General Division of the High Court of Singapore4 Jul 2011Suit No 152 of 2011 (Summons No 1924 of 2011)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“d Nicholls, at [58] per Lord Hoffmann and at [80] per Lord Millett). It remained an open question as to whether Johnson ought to apply in Singapore (see Chan Miu Yin v Philip Morris Singapore Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 161 at [44]–[45]; Cheah Peng Hock at [61]; Wee Kim San at [34]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 152 of 2011 (Summons No 1924 of 2011)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-07-04
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.