Judgment Header
Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and another [2011] SGHC 223
Court DecisionSGHC
[2011] SGHC 223
[2011] SGHC 223
General Division of the High Court of Singapore5 Oct 2011Suit No 33 of 2011 (Summons No 3725 of 2011)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 10 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
10Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ated to discovery and referred to the ‘train of inquiry’ concept. The court said (at page 527) : [11] (b) What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance of the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano [1882] 11 QBD 55, where th”
“eference to the 9 pleadings but there need not be a pleading for a matter to be said to be in issue.” (b)What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance of the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co [1882] 11 QBD 55, where”
“rujuk kepada kes Bandar Utama Development Sdn Bhd & Anor v Bandar Utama 1 JMB [2019] 10 CLJ 516 (COA) : “What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Pte Lid v Tay Seng Leon and another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance of the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co [1882] 11 QBD 55, where”
“{11] (b) What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance of the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano [1882] 11 QBD 55, where the court said: “It seems to me that every document relates fo the matters in question in the ac”
“(b) What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Re Ltd v. Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance on the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifigue v. Peruvian Guano Co [1882] 11 QBD 55, where the court said: “It seems to me that every document relates to the matters in question in th”
Show 5 moreShow fewer
“nt Sdn Bhd & Anor v Bandar Utama 1 JMB [2019] 10 CLJ 516, where the Court of Appeal held that – “[11]…(b) What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Pte Ltd v. Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance of the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v. Peruvian Guano Co [1882] 11 QBD 55, whe”
“(b) What amounts to relevance was discussed in Sufface Stone Pts Ltd v. Tay Seng Leon and Anotheti [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance on the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v. Peruvian Guano Co [1882] 11 QBD 55, where the Court said: "It seems to me that every document relates to the matters in question in th”
“(b) What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance of the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co [1882] 11 QBD 55, where the Court said: "It seems to me that every document relates to the matters in question in the”
“(b) What amounts to relevance was discussed in Surface Stone Pte Ltd v. Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223, in reliance on the case of Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v. Peruvian Guano Co [1882] 11 QBD 55, where the court said: "It seems to me that every document relates to the matters in question in th”
“Singapore Court of Appeal in Tan Chin Seng and others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] 2 SLR(R) 465 at [35] and that of the Singapore High Court in Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and another [2011] SGHC 223 at [10(a)]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 33 of 2011 (Summons No 3725 of 2011)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-10-05
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.