Judgment Header
Tan Thiam Wee v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGHC 142
Loading…
[2012] SGHC 142
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Jul 2012Magistrate's Appeal No 282 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The element of personal gain and the deliberate deception of potential investors was highlighted by the DJ to distinguish the present case from Tan Thiam Wee v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGHC 142 (“Tan Thiam Wee”): at [18(i)–(ii)]. These aggravating factors, as well as the higher losses (ie, of $298,207.11) suffered by t”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Tan Thiam Wee v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGHC 142
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 282 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-07-11
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.