Judgment Header
Tan Thiam Wee v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGHC 142
Court DecisionSGHC
[2012] SGHC 142
[2012] SGHC 142
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Jul 2012Magistrate's Appeal No 282 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by [2016] SGHC 06
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The element of personal gain and the deliberate deception of potential investors was highlighted by the DJ to distinguish the present case from Tan Thiam Wee v Public Prosecutor [2012] SGHC 142 (“Tan Thiam Wee”): at [18(i)–(ii)]. These aggravating factors, as well as the higher losses (ie, of $298,207.11) suffered by t”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 282 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-07-11
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.