Judgment Header
AWN v AWO and another appeal [2012] SGHC 228
Court DecisionSGHC
[2012] SGHC 228
[2012] SGHC 228
General Division of the High Court of Singapore16 Nov 2012Originating Summons (Family) No 274 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal No 189 of 2011) & Divorce No 4739 of 2011 (Registrar's Appeal No 148 of 2012)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“rty to blatantly besmirch the repute of Prosecution witnesses (at [38]). These principles do not only apply to represented defendants. They apply to SRPs as well (see eg, AWN v AWO and another appeal [2012] SGHC 228 at [10]). The Appellant ought to have conducted himself according to these principles, especially when t”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons (Family) No 274 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal No 189 of 2011) & Divorce No 4739 of 2011 (Registrar's Appeal No 148 of 2012)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-11-16
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.