Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ong Eng Teck [2012] SGHC 242
Court DecisionSGHC
[2012] SGHC 242
[2012] SGHC 242
General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 Nov 2012Magistrate's Appeal No 221 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“s been defined as the inducing of a person to believe to be true something which the person making the representation knows is in fact false (see Gunasegeran at [42]; Public Prosecutor v Ong Eng Teck [2012] SGHC 242 at [23]; Rahj Kamal bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor [1997] 3 SLR(R) 227 at [24]).”
“igh Court in Gunasegeran s/o Pavadaisamy v Public Prosecutor [1997] 2 SLR(R) 946 at [42]; Rahj Kamal bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor [1997] 3 SLR(R) 227 at [24]; and Public Prosecutor v Ong Eng Teck [2012] SGHC 242 at [23]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 221 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-11-30
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.