Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ong Eng Teck [2012] SGHC 242
Loading…
[2012] SGHC 242
General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 Nov 2012Magistrate's Appeal No 221 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“s been defined as the inducing of a person to believe to be true something which the person making the representation knows is in fact false (see Gunasegeran at [42]; Public Prosecutor v Ong Eng Teck [2012] SGHC 242 at [23]; Rahj Kamal bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor [1997] 3 SLR(R) 227 at [24]).”
“igh Court in Gunasegeran s/o Pavadaisamy v Public Prosecutor [1997] 2 SLR(R) 946 at [42]; Rahj Kamal bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor [1997] 3 SLR(R) 227 at [24]; and Public Prosecutor v Ong Eng Teck [2012] SGHC 242 at [23]).”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ong Eng Teck [2012] SGHC 242
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 221 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-11-30
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.