[2012] SGHC 33

“s I am not inclined to allow any increase, I will balance this by not taking into account any income tax of 2.5% as was done by Tay Yong Kwang J in Toh Wai Sie and another v Rajendran s/o G Selamuthu [2012] SGHC 33.”

“a multiplier that could apply in respect of Ms Kuppusamy’s claim for LFE. I note that Huationg highlights, in relation to the multiplier for FMEs, Toh Wai Sie and another v Ranjendran s/o G Selamuthu [2012] SGHC 33 (“Toh Wai Sie”). Huationg’s submission is that this case is not applicable and Ms Kuppusamy has not relie”

“In relation to the issue of nursing care in particular, I note the decision of Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) in Toh Wai Sie and another v Ranjendran s/o G Selamuthu [2012] SGHC 33 (“Toh Wai Sie”). In Toh Wai Sie, there was an issue of whether the plaintiff should be placed in a nursing home. Crucially, both the pla”

“The High Court decision of Toh Wai Sie and another v Ranjendran s/o G Selamuthu [2012] SGHC 33 (“Toh Wai Sie”) might be regarded as an example of this approach being applied to determine whether cost of nursing care should be awarded. In that case, the defendant challenged the need for such co”