Judgment Header
United Overseas Bank Ltd v Giok Bie Jao and others [2012] SGHC 56
Court DecisionSGHC
[2012] SGHC 56
[2012] SGHC 56
General Division of the High Court of Singapore16 Mar 2012Originating Summons No 514 of 2010
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“In United Overseas Bank Ltd v Giok Bie Jao and others [2012] SGHC 56, Belinda Ang Saw Ean J, who observed, obiter, (at [16]) that the looser approach seems “eminently sensible”, referred to the following revised view in Snell’s Equity (John McGhee gen ed) (Sweet & Max”
“An ostensibly more progressive approach was advocated in the Singapore High Court decision of United Overseas Bank Ltd v Giok Bie Jao and others [2012] SGHC 56 (“Giok Bie Jao”). There, Belinda Ang Saw Ean J stated (albeit in obiter) at [16]:”
“In United Overseas Bank Ltd v Giok Bie Jao and others [2012] SGHC 56 at [16], Belinda Ang J, in explaining the types of evidence that may rebut the presumption of resulting trust, favoured an approach which allows evidence of subsequent conduct to be admitted, leaving”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 514 of 2010
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-03-16
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.