Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ali bin Bakar and another appeal [2012] SGHC 83
Court DecisionSGHC
[2012] SGHC 83
[2012] SGHC 83
General Division of the High Court of Singapore17 Apr 2012Magistrate's Appeal No 11 of 2012 (DAC No 50185 of 2011, DAC No 50461 of 2011, DAC No 487 of 2012 and DAC No 2173 of 2012) and Magistrate's Appeal No 12 of 2012 (DAC No 50186 of 2011, DAC No 50440 of 2011, DAC No 492 of 2012 and DAC No 2174 of 2012)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“r specific deterrence was a valid basis for imposing a sentence above the mandatory minimum for the Enhanced Possession Charge. As was observed in Public Prosecutor v Ali bin Bakar and another appeal [2012] SGHC 83 at [6]:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 11 of 2012 (DAC No 50185 of 2011, DAC No 50461 of 2011, DAC No 487 of 2012 and DAC No 2173 of 2012) and Magistrate's Appeal No 12 of 2012 (DAC No 50186 of 2011, DAC No 50440 of 2011, DAC No 492 of 2012 and DAC No 2174 of 2012)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-04-17
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.