Judgment Header
AZS and another v AZR [2013] SGHC 102
Court DecisionSGHC
[2013] SGHC 102
[2013] SGHC 102
General Division of the High Court of Singapore9 May 2013Divorce No 3090 of 2012 (Registrar's Appeal Subordinate Courts No 212 of 2012)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“eration various connecting factors, the weight of which varies with each factual matrix. A factor that proves to be the tipping point in one case might not be that important in another: see AZS v AZR [2013] SGHC 102 (at [11(a)]) and BDA v BDB 1 SLR 607 (“BDA v BDB”) (at [24]).”
“It is trite that the location of the matrimonial assets is a relevant consideration in a stay application. The following observations of the court in AZS v AZR [2013] SGHC 102 (“AZS v AZR”) (at [21]) bear this out clearly:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Divorce No 3090 of 2012 (Registrar's Appeal Subordinate Courts No 212 of 2012)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-05-09
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.