Judgment Header
Goh Liang Yong Jonah and another v Heng Kuek Hoy and another [2013] SGHC 203
Court DecisionSGHC
[2013] SGHC 203
[2013] SGHC 203
General Division of the High Court of Singapore3 Oct 2013Originating Summons No 58 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“) and at [12] that “[i]f the deposit amount is excessive it will also be caught by the law of penalty”. Triangle Auto was in turn cited in Goh Liang Yong Jonah and another v Heng Kuek Hoy and another [2013] SGHC 203 at [35] as authority for the proposition that a sum has to be reasonable in order to take effect as a de”
“c)(i) any sum greater than the sum stipulated as the “deposit”. In coming to this conclusion, I also considered the High Court decision of Goh Liang Yong Jonah and another v Heng Kuek Hoy and another [2013] SGHC 203 (“Goh Liang Yong Jonah”), which was cited by the Applicants. There, the court opined that a clause that”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 58 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-10-03
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.