Judgment Header
Thomas Teddy and another v Kuiper International Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 7
Court DecisionSGHC
[2013] SGHC 7
[2013] SGHC 7
General Division of the High Court of Singapore10 Jan 2013Originating Summons No 340 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal No 183 of 2012)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“did not have any intention to assert an interest over the Watch which was inconsistent with the rights of the appellants. Citing the High Court’s decision in Thomas Teddy and another v Kuiper Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 7 (“Thomas Teddy”), the appellants argue that Mr Tuppani did in fact have such an intention, as evinced by h”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 340 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal No 183 of 2012)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-01-10
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.