Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77
Loading…
[2013] SGHC 77
General Division of the High Court of Singapore9 Apr 2013Criminal Case No 19 of 2011
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 6 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“(c) Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77 (“Ravindran”): The offender rushed at the victim, a domestic helper employed by his neighbour, as she was leaving the neighbouring flat. He forced his way inside and proceeded to rape her twice. Betw”
“(c) As a matter of precedent, the present case warranted a heavier sentence than that imposed in Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77 (“Ravindran”), which was to date the only case under s 307(1) of the PC since the amendment of the provision in 2007. In this regard, cases under s 304(a) of the PC for”
“the middle to upper reaches of Band 2 involved more serious violence or aggravating factors such as gang rape or abuse of a position of trust: at [54], citing Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77, Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7 and Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Fadzli bin Abdul Rahim [2008] SGHC”
“In PP v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77 (“Ravindran”), a sentence of 12 years’ imprisonment and 6 strokes of the cane was imposed for an attempted murder charge through strangulation by hand and with the use of a raffia string. The accused”
“o 18 years’ imprisonment and five to six strokes of caning was consistent with the cases that have been decided since the amendments to s 307(1) of the Penal Code. These were PP v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77, PP v BPK [2018] 5 SLR 755 (“BPK”) and Shoo Ah San.”
“Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases (Academy Publishing, 2010) (“the Guidelines”) at p 3). 15 is “the maximum score” (see Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77 at [59]) and 3 is “the lowest possible” score (see Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian [2010] SGCA”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 19 of 2011
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2013-04-09
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.