Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Adith s/o Sarvotham [2014] SGHC 103
Court DecisionSGHC
[2014] SGHC 103
[2014] SGHC 103
General Division of the High Court of Singapore27 May 2014Magistrate's Appeal No 302 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“r within five months of the order, this court should not impose any other form of 9 punishment as that would be double punishment. Counsel referred to the Singapore case of PP v Adith s/o Sarvotham [2014] SGHC 103. Sentencing Principles 21. In Peilis Sami v. PP [2014] 6 CLJ 670[17] Hishamuddin JCA (as he then was) reit”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 302 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-05-27
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.