Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop [2014] SGHC 125
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 125
General Division of the High Court of Singapore30 Jun 2014Criminal Case No 10 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ases of PP v Yap Siew Luan [2002] SGHC 93 (“Yap Siew Luan”), PP v Pienaar Hermanus Nicolaas, Criminal Case No. 40 of 2014 (28 October 2014, unreported) (“Pienaar”), PP v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop [2014] SGHC 125, PP v Hoang Thi Tuong Van, Criminal Case No. 42 of 2014 (28 May 2015, unreported) (“Hoang Thi Tuong Van””
“.85g of diamorphine. Therefore, the burden was on the accused to rebut this presumption on a balance of probabilities. This was the approach taken in Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop [2014] SGHC 125. As part of its case, the Prosecution submitted that the accused was wilfully blind to the quantity of d”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Farid bin Mohd Yusop [2014] SGHC 125
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 10 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-06-30
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.