Judgment Header
YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 142
General Division of the High Court of Singapore15 Jul 2014Originating Summons No 1223 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 10 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“hd v Ns Bluescope Lysaght Malaysia Sdn Bhd [2015] MLJU 1125 W Y Steel Construction Pte Ltd v Osko Pte Ltd [2013] 3 SLR 380 YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 Legislation: Arbitration (Amendment) Act 2018, sub-s 3(1) 45 Building and Construction Industry Security o”
“nt, an adjudication application filed outside of this timeline would warrant the adjudication determination being set aside: YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 at [47]–[49].”
“ation determination is liable to be set aside if it flows from an adjudication application which was lodged out of time: see YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 at [43]-[49] and UES Holdings Pte Ltd v Grouteam Pte Ltd [2016] 1 SLR 312 (“Grouteam (HC)”) at [51].”
“(c) YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142, concerned non-compliance of s 10(3) of SOPA. After considering JFC Builders and Admin Construction, Tan Siong Thye J held that a breach of s 10(3) of SOPA could not be waived given that it went to t”
“2013] 1 SLR 1157 (“JFC Builders”); Admin Construction Pte Ltd v Vivaldi (S) Pte Ltd [2013] 3 SLR 609 (“Admin Construction”); YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 (“YTL Construction”); and LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 648 (“L”
“ific Construction & Development Pte Ltd [2013] 2 SLR 776, Admin Construction Pte Ltd v Vivaldi (S) Pte Ltd [2013] 3 SLR 609, YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 and LH Aluminium Industries Pte Ltd v Newcon Builders Pte Ltd [2015] 1 SLR 648 were no longer good law (”
“settled law that an adjudication determination can be set aside for the adjudication application being made out of time: see YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 at [43]–[49], UES Holdings Pte Ltd v Grouteam Pte Ltd [2016] 1 SLR 312 at [51], UES Holdings Pte Ltd v K”
“de the day on which it does so. The defendant noted that the adjudicator’s interpretation is consistent with the decision in YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 (“YTL”). Further, the defendant relied on s 50(a) of the Interpretation Act 1965 (2020 Rev Ed) (the “IA””
“In so far as MT relied on YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 (“YTL”) to support its interpretation, the Judge noted (see H P Construction (GD) at [10]), and we agreed, that the point was not argued there. In that case, the adjudication application was lodged a”
“cation would invalidate an adjudication determination because the timelines under SOPA were to be strictly followed: see eg, YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142 at [48] (“YTL Construction”) and Grouteam (HC) at [43] and [51]. With regard to the last cited case, it”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
YTL Construction (S) Pte Ltd v Balanced Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 142
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 1223 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-07-15
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.