Judgment Header
Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan and another [2014] SGHC 147
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 147
General Division of the High Court of Singapore22 Jul 2014Originating Summons No 1132 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 6 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“] NSWSC 583. 18) Tai May Chean v United Eastern Resources Sdn Bhd & Anor [2022] 4 MLJ 779 CA. 19) Tiong Sze Yin Serene v HC Surgical Specialist Ltd [2021] 3 SLR 1269. 20) Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan [2014] SGHC 147. LEGISLATION REFERRED TO: 1) Companies Act 2016 Act 777, sections 310(b), 345, 347, 347(3), 348, 348(4),”
“onship between the plaintiff and the first defendant did not show lack of good faith as personal animosity is not sufficient to preclude a s 216A application: Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan and another [2014] SGHC 147 at [77]. No personal vendetta or desire to destroy the company existed in the present case.”
“nt’s good faith will also be in doubt if he appears set on damaging the company out of sheer spite or for the benefit of a competitor: Pang Yong Hock at [20]; Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan and another [2014] SGHC 147 (“Wong Kai Wah”) at [70].”
“r part in the present proceedings. The failure to be fully candid before the court has been held in various cases to indicate a lack of good faith: see for example Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan & anor [2014] SGHC 147 (“Wong Kai Wah”) at [66]; Agus Irawan at [9]; Petroships at [117] to [128]; and Jian Li Investments at [”
“ceedings: A complainant must “come to court with utmost candour and honesty” as “[h]ints of lack of candour may justify an inference of a lack of good faith”: Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan and another [2014] SGHC 147 (“Wong Kai Wah”) at [66]. Consequently, in line with the need for complete candour, good faith requires”
“licant to fully apprise the court of all material and relevant facts may be indicative of a lack of good faith (Jian Li Investments at [48], citing Agus Irawan at [9] and Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan [2014] SGHC 147 at [66]).”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Wong Kai Wah v Wong Kai Yuan and another [2014] SGHC 147
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 1132 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-07-22
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.