Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Purushothaman a/l Subramaniam [2014] SGHC 215
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 215
General Division of the High Court of Singapore28 Oct 2014Criminal Case No 27 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“of evidence, the purpose for which the evidence is sought to be admitted is vital (see Tan Meng Jee v Public Prosecutor [1996] 2 SLR(R) 178 at [37]; Public Prosecutor v Purushothaman a/l Subramaniam [2014] SGHC 215 at [60]). If the Prosecution seeks to admit evidence for the purpose of showing an accused person’s viole”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Purushothaman a/l Subramaniam [2014] SGHC 215
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 27 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-10-28
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.