Judgment Header
Teddy, Thomas v Teacly (S) Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 226
Court DecisionSGHC
[2014] SGHC 226
[2014] SGHC 226
General Division of the High Court of Singapore6 Nov 2014Suit No 33 of 2012 (Registrar's Appeal No 367 of 2013)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“at the C5/6 level. It was clear to me however that contrary to the submissions of Plaintiff’s counsel, the Plaintiff’s injuries were not as severe as in the case of Teddy, Thomas v Teacly (S) Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 226. (“Teddy Thomas”) where the claimant was awarded $60,000 in relation to his spine injury. In Teddy Thoma”
“A case in point is Teddy, Thomas v Teacly (S) Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 226 (“Teddy Thomas”). The facts of that case are as follows.”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 33 of 2012 (Registrar's Appeal No 367 of 2013)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-11-06
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.