[2014] SGHC 230

“ase are what set it apart from most other local cases where the identity of the Internet user who posts the offending material is not in dispute. Examples include Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng Yi Ling [2014] SGHC 230 and Attorney-General v Au Wai Pang [2015] 2 SLR 352 (and the decision on appeal in Au Wai Pang v Attorne”

“Quantum relied on Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng Yi Ling [2014] SGHC 230 (“Roy Ngerng”) at [55] to submit that an injunction should be granted against SA because there was reason to believe SA may further publish defamatory words of Quantum. Quantum submitted that after t”

“In both Review Publishing at [81], and Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng Yi Ling [2014] SGHC 230 at [32], the Court observed that the ordinary reasonable person is assumed to possess general knowledge and experience of worldly affairs. This general knowledge extends to matters of current affairs”

“As to the applicable principles for the granting of an injunction, the High Court held in Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng Yi Ling [2014] SGHC 230 (“Roy Ngerng”) (at [55]–[58]) that, where the court finds that the defendant is liable for defamation, the court will grant a final injunction restraining further publication of”

“This is confirmed by the High Court in Lee Hsien Loong v Roy Ngerng Yi Ling [2014] SGHC 230 (“Roy Ngerng”) which stated as follows at [55]:”