[2014] SGHC 251

“onsiderations do not arise here because on the evidence, it does not appear that the time of payment was vital to the transaction (see Siemens Industry Software Pte Ltd v Lion Global Offshore Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 251 at [36]). Indeed, Oon himself agreed to the extension of the period before the buyback option could be e”

“ich contemplates that evidence of a separate oral agreement may be adduced if it supplements a written contract. The Defendants also cited the case of Siemens Industry Software v Lion Global Offshore [2014] SGHC 251 (“Siemens”) to argue that such a gap does not render the written contract void and that subsequent suppl”

“While the Plaintiff relies on my earlier decision in Siemens Industry Software Pte Ltd v Lion Global Offshore Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 251 (“Siemens Industry”) at [34] in support of its case that agreements entered outside the commercial context in a more friendly context cannot be expected to be drafted with the utmost pre”