Judgment Header
ABW v ABV [2014] SGHC 29
Court DecisionSGHC
[2014] SGHC 29
[2014] SGHC 29
General Division of the High Court of Singapore19 Feb 2014Divorce Suit No 3480 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeals Sub-Court No 3 of 2013)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“uch alienation. The courts have explained that “the term alienation applies to a cluster of psychological responses in a child towards a parent with whom he once had a loving relationship” (ABW v ABV [2014] SGHC 29 (“ABW v ABV”) at [27], citing Re S [2011] 1 F.L.R. 1789). On these facts, there was, quite simply, no sig”
“sponsibility to make decisions in the best interests of the child. It is generally recognised that it is in the interests of a child for both parents to be involved in the child’s life (see ABW v ABV [2014] SGHC 29; [2014] 2 SLR 769 at [23]). Where the Court has granted care and control of a child to one parent, and ac”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Divorce Suit No 3480 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeals Sub-Court No 3 of 2013)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-02-19
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.