Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 7
General Division of the High Court of Singapore2 Jan 2014Criminal Case No 10 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 7 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“(d) Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7 (“BNN”): The offender was the stepfather of the victim and his abuse of the victim began when she was just 11. He first touched her inappropriately and his abuses grew in intensity and perversion ove”
“secutively. The Prosecution submitted that this was in line with the sentences meted out in other cases concerning sexual abuse by a family member over an extended period (see Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7 (“PP v BNN”) and BMD v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGCA 70).”
“The next case was Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7. The accused, aged 37, pleaded guilty to seven charges of sexual offences and causing hurt. The accused was sentenced to 32 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. But for the 24-stroke speci”
“ay make a victim more vulnerable because it may afford the offender an opportunity for a more sustained course of sexual assault. This is the case with young victims: consider Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7, where the offender was the stepfather of the victim and abused her over three years, his abuses growing i”
“ase fell within the upper reaches of Band 2, thus attracting a sentence from 16 to 17 years of imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for each offence. They cited the case of Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7 (“BNN”), Public Prosecutor v AOM [2011] 2 SLR 1057 (“AOM”) and Public Prosecutor v AHB [2010] SGHC 138 (“A”
“nvolved more serious violence or aggravating factors such as gang rape or abuse of a position of trust: at [54], citing Public Prosecutor v Ravindran Annamalai [2013] SGHC 77, Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7 and Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Fadzli bin Abdul Rahim [2008] SGHC 177. In our judgment, the case before u”
“Other instances of familial sexual abuse of children include Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7 (“BNN”). In that case, the victim’s step-father had begun sexually abusing her when she was 11 years old and routinely physically abused the victim and her sister. There were also multiple charges of”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v BNN [2014] SGHC 7
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 10 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-01-02
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.