Judgment Header
Tempcool Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Chong Vincent and others [2015] SGHC 100
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 100
[2015] SGHC 100
General Division of the High Court of Singapore9 Apr 2015Suit No 437 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“Likewise, I am satisfied that the Tender Projects Information is confidential in nature. I agree with Edmund Leow JC’s observation in Tempcool Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Chong Vincent and others [2015] SGHC 100 at [59] that “a company’s pricing information such as quotations and pricing mechanisms is generally confident”
“w of Singapore (Academy Publishing, 2013) that any form of use or disclosure would be unauthorised use. Prof Leong’s views were endorsed in Tempcool Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Chong Vincent and others [2015] SGHC 100 (“Tempcool”). I must note that both Prof Leong’s statement in her textbook and the decision in Tempcool”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 437 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-04-09
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.