Judgment Header
Enholco Pte Ltd v Schonk, Antonius Martinus Mattheus and Another [2015] SGHC 108
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 108
[2015] SGHC 108
General Division of the High Court of Singapore28 Apr 2015Suit No 212 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“Schonk Antonius Martinus Mattheus and another [2015] SGHC 108. The Judge found in favour of EPL that Mr Mattheus had breached his duty to his employer in various ways. The Judge allowed some heads of damages claimed by EPL, but not others. The Judge also dismis”
“law that a party should be bound by its pleaded case: see Tan Poh Choo Joscelyn v Tan Poh Seng and another [2014] SGHC 22 at [81] and Enholco Pte Ltd v Schonk, Antonius Martinus Mattheus and Another [2015] SGHC 108 at [2]. Neither did they put this contention to the plaintiff for him to explain his position. In Suhha N”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 212 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-04-28
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.