Judgment Header
United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bombay Talkies (S) Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 142
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 142
[2015] SGHC 142
General Division of the High Court of Singapore26 May 2015Companies Winding Up No 138 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ined from suggesting (even as a matter of dicta) that under Singapore law, the creditor’s statutory demand must state all three options (see also United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bombay Talkies (S) Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 142 at [17]). Instead, it went on to say (at [14]) that:”
“In United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bombay Talkies (S) Pte Ltd [2015] SGHC 142 (“Bombay Talkies”) for example, the affidavit of service for a winding up application erroneously stated the unit number of the Official Receiver as #06-11 instead of #06-01. This error was treated a”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Companies Winding Up No 138 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-05-26
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.