[2015] SGHC 144

“cess of service had begun.” [78] The Plaintiff’s counsel drew attention of this court to Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and another [2015] SGHC 144 which usefully set out a category of cases where any irregularity in service can be cured if such service”

“Rule that is contrary to the laws of the foreign country”. Citing the case authority of Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v P T Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and another [2015] SGHC 144, the Father asserts that substituted service is only allowed if it does not contravene the law of the for”

“y way of that originating process. Matters relating to service of process are procedural (Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and another [2015] SGHC 144 at [101]). PKUF Commodities’ characterization of the question as being one of whether the GDHC has juris”