Judgment Header
Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh and another [2015] SGHC 149
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 149
[2015] SGHC 149
General Division of the High Court of Singapore29 May 2015Suit No 245 of 2009 (Registrar's Appeal No 390 of 2013 and Registrar's Appeal No 391 of 2013)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
4Later cases and laws citing this decision
- Cited1. ) GOLDEN PLUS HOLDINGS BERHAD v 1. ) CHINA IDEA DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (WA-22NCC-605-12/2020)Case
“5] Andrew and Yong Chooi Lan’s argument that the claim is not actionable because the winding up of GP BVI did not materialise is without merit. As established in Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh and another [2015] SGHC 149, in conspiracy cases “damages are at large and the court is S/N Yvwtb2AFpk50KUgpFho0w **Note : Serial nu”
“11. Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh and another [2015] SGHC 149; [2015] 4”
“11. Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh and another [2015] SGHC 149; [2015] 4”
- CitedMohd Fahmi bin Mohd Hata v Bandar Baru Klang Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd (BL-22NCvC-9-04/2021)Case
“uala Terengganu Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors [2021] 9 MLJ 10 involve the suppression of medical records as grounds for awarding aggravated damages whilst in Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh and another [2015] SGHC 149; [2015] 4 SLR 667, the Court found the conduct of the hospital in tampering with the Consent Form and co”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 245 of 2009 (Registrar's Appeal No 390 of 2013 and Registrar's Appeal No 391 of 2013)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-05-29
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.