Judgment Header
Goldring, Timothy Nicholas v Public Prosecutor and other appeals [2015] SGHC 158
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 158
[2015] SGHC 158
General Division of the High Court of Singapore11 Jun 2015Magistrate's Appeals No 121-122 of 2014/01-02
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“tion [1907] AC 351 at 353 per Lord Loreburn LC, at 356 per the Earl of Halsbury, and at 362 per Lord James of Hereford. As Tay Yong Kwang J explained in Goldring, Timothy Nicholas v Public Prosecutor [2015] SGHC 158 at [61], the reason for that principle is that a clause purporting to exclude liability for fraud is oft”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeals No 121-122 of 2014/01-02
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-06-11
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.