Judgment Header
Emmanuel Priya Ethel Anne v Su Emmanuel and Another [2015] SGHC 172
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 172
[2015] SGHC 172
General Division of the High Court of Singapore1 Jul 2015Originating Summons No 1124 of 2014
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 1 later decision. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
1Later cases and laws citing this decision
“, the Judge held that the sister was beneficially entitled to 70% of the property as compared to the 49% interest that she held as legal owner: see Emmanuel Priya Ethel Anne v Su Emmanuel and Another [2015] SGHC 172 (“the GD”). On appeal, the wife contends that the Judge erred on both counts.”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Originating Summons No 1124 of 2014
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-07-01
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.