Judgment Header
Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and another (Foo Jee Seng, intervener) [2015] SGHC 176
Loading…
[2015] SGHC 176
General Division of the High Court of Singapore9 Jul 2015Suit No 764 of 2013 (Registrar's Appeals Nos 396 and 397 of 2015, Summons Nos 786 and 787 of 2015)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ant’s appeal in full, and only partially allowed the Plaintiffs’ appeal. These are summarised at [22] of my decision in Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and another (Foo Jee Seng, intervener) [2015] SGHC 176 (“the Amendment Judgment”). In essence, I allowed various paragraphs relating to the 2nd Defendant’s han”
“the funds. The rationale of avoiding multiplicity of suits was clearly engaged. Another example of this restriction is Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and another (Foo Jee Seng, intervener) [2015] SGHC 176, where George Wei J disallowed the plaintiff from suing in his personal capacity as beneficiary when it w”
“I can do no better than to echo the observations of George Wei J in Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and another (Foo Jee Seng, intervener) [2015] SGHC 176 at [32] explaining the rationale underpinning the rule:”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Foo Jee Boo and another v Foo Jhee Tuang and another (Foo Jee Seng, intervener) [2015] SGHC 176
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 764 of 2013 (Registrar's Appeals Nos 396 and 397 of 2015, Summons Nos 786 and 787 of 2015)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-07-09
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.