[2015] SGHC 194

“evance of IVF treatment to indirect contribution, in recognition of the “high toll” it exacts on the mother, physically, emotionally and psychologically, was recognised by the High Court in AVM v AWH [2015] SGHC 194 (at [64]). Further, even after the birth of their son, it must have been extremely difficult for the Wif”

“The ancillary matters were first fixed to be heard in the Family Court on 12 November 2015. Arising from the decision in AVM v AWH [2015] SGHC 194 (“AVM v AWH”), this was held in abeyance until the annulment of the second bankruptcy on 21 June 2016. After a case conference on 12 August 2016, the ancillary matters were”

“ehaviour that belies an impaired ability to make decisions in the child’s best interests, the courts have taken on board such considerations in granting sole custody to the other parent. In AVM v AWH [2015] SGHC 194, the High Court granted the wife sole custody of the children because the husband’s behaviour demonstrat”

“s could not be divorced from the bankruptcy regime, which necessitated ascertaining the extent of the bankrupt’s estate and ensuring proper supervision by the Official Assignee. As noted in AVM v AWH [2015] SGHC 194 (at [115]), only assets which have not vested in the Official Assignee can be divided. There are also st”