Judgment Header
Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc and others [2015] SGHC 206
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 206
[2015] SGHC 206
General Division of the High Court of Singapore5 Aug 2015Suit No 642 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been reversed in a later judgment and cited in 2 other later decisions. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Reversed by 1. CRANBORNE ENTERPRISES LIMITED (Registration No. 1673723) v 1. EXPORT-IMPOT BANK OF MALAYSIA BERHAD (Company No. 357198-K) (WA-22NCC-155-03/2019 (No. 2))
- Reversed by [2018] SGCA 17
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
4Later cases and laws citing this decision
“fraudulently overcharged in breach of the company’s contract with the plaintiff was clearly in breach of his fiduciary duties owed to the company. In Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACATek, Inc and others [2015] SGHC 206 (which was 15 reversed on appeal on a different point), Vinodh Coomaraswamy J held (at [119]) that a dire”
“fraudulently overcharged in breach of the company’s contract with the plaintiff was clearly in breach of his fiduciary duties owed to the company. In Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACATek, Inc and others [2015] SGHC 206 (which was reversed on appeal on a different point), Vinodh Coomaraswamy J held (at [119]) that a directo”
“is a director if: (i) he is acting bona fide in the discharge of his office as a director; and (ii) he is acting within the scope of his authority” (Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc and others [2015] SGHC 206 at [117]; citing Said v Butt [1920] 3 KB 497 at 506 and Chong Hon Kuan Ivan v Levy Maurice (No 2) [2004]”
“dgment for Tembusu for S$1.5m and interest (being its claim under the 2012 CLA), US$1.5m and interest (being its claim under the 2007 CLA) and costs: Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc and others [2015] SGHC 206 (“ACTAtek (HC)”). I dismissed the defendants’ counterclaim in its entirety.”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 642 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-08-05
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.