Judgment Header
Yeo Boong Hua and others v Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 207
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 207
[2015] SGHC 207
General Division of the High Court of Singapore6 Aug 2015Suit No 27 of 2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“t 1950, she is entitled to terminate the consent order. Counsel cites the Singapore High Court and Court of Appeal’s decision in Yeo Boong Hua and others v Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 207; [2015] 5 SLR 268; Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and 10 others v Yeo Boong Hua and others [2017] 2 SLR”
“ed whether they had agreed to other changes or to any additional terms (see [15]–[16] of the judgment below, which is reported as Yeo Boong Hua and others v Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 207 (“the Judgment”)). The Judge did not think it was necessary to make a finding on this. The Respondents h”
“This judgment is issued as a supplement to an earlier decision of this Court dated 6 August 2015 in Yeo Boong Hua and others v Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 207 (“the HC Judgment”). The HC Judgment concerned the setting aside of the Consent Order entered into by the parties in settlement of the”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 27 of 2009
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-08-06
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.