Judgment Header
Malini Ventura v Knight Capital Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 225
[2015] SGHC 225
General Division of the High Court of Singapore27 Aug 2015HC/ Suit No 792 of 2015 (HC/Summons Nos 3763 and 3844 of 2015)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“a phrase I had used at the hearing of Enclosure 44, which was coincidentally also used in a Singapore High Court case cited by learned counsel for the 2nd Defendant, Malini Ventura v. Knight Capital [2015] SGHC 225, [2015] 5 SLR 707. [60] Malini Ventura (supra) was heavily relied on by learned counsel for the 2nd Defen”
“a phrase I had used at the hearing of Enclosure 44, which was coincidentally also used in a Singapore High Court case cited by learned counsel for the 2nd Defendant, Malini Ventura v. Knight Capital [2015] SGHC 225, [2015] 5 SLR 707. [60] Malini Ventura (supra) was heavily relied on by learned counsel for the 2nd Defen”
“g Very Sumito”). Although light, the burden is nevertheless real. Judith Prakash J has characterised it as the burden of showing a prima facie case: Malini Ventura v Knight Capital Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 225 at [36] (“Malini Ventura”). The alleviation of the usual civil burden is justified in this context becau”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Malini Ventura v Knight Capital Pte Ltd and others [2015] SGHC 225
Case Metadata
Case No: HC/ Suit No 792 of 2015 (HC/Summons Nos 3763 and 3844 of 2015)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-08-27
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.