Judgment Header
Motorola Solutions Credit Co LLC v Kemal Uzan and others [2015] SGHC 228
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 228
[2015] SGHC 228
General Division of the High Court of Singapore3 Sept 2015Suit No 1046 of 2013 (HC/Summons No 2356 of 2015)
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ng documents from B which were disclosed pursuant to the common interest between A and B in the subject matter of the communications (see, eg, Motorola Solutions Credit Co LLC v Kemal Uzan and others [2015] SGHC 228). Second, it can also be used to enable A to obtain from B documents which B can withhold on the ground”
“n the party is liable to be cross-examined upon the affidavit if the court so orders; Comet Products at 74F. This position has also been taken locally in Motorola Solutions Credit Co LLC v Kemal Uzan [2015] SGHC 228 (“Motorola Solutions Credit”). There, the plaintiffs referred to some e-mails in an affidavit supporting”
“See, also, Motorola Solutions Credit Co LLC v Kemal Uzan [2015] SGHC 228 (partially reported in [2015] 5 SLR 752) (“Motorola”) at [16] and [22].”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 1046 of 2013 (HC/Summons No 2356 of 2015)
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-09-03
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.