Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad bin Abdullah and another [2015] SGHC 231
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 231
[2015] SGHC 231
General Division of the High Court of Singapore2 Sept 2015Criminal Case No 25 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“As the facts of the case have been set out by the Judge in his Grounds of Decision (“GD”) in Public Prosecutor v Muhammad bin Abdullah and another [2015] SGHC 231, we will state only the facts that are pertinent for these appeals. There was some ambiguity in the submissions on the use of the terms “bundle” and “packet””
“(b) The frequency of supply available to the accused (PP v Muhammad bin Abdullah [2015] SGHC 231 (“Muhammad bin Abdullah HC”) at [19]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Criminal Case No 25 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-09-02
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.